Hands Off Hartlebury Common

Contact the author of the petition

This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition Hands Off Hartlebury Common.


Guest

#351

2011-06-29 01:32

Having spoken with the rangers on many occasions even they do not seem to have any justifiable reasons for the changes.They just seem to be doing what they are told. The argument I put forward is that the Common has evolved over the last 50 years or so into what it is now and what Natural England are doing is actually interfering with the natural evolvement of the common. It appears to me that all that use the common do not want the trees removed and the character of the common changed artificially.

Guest

#352

2011-06-29 01:33

I walk my dogs on Hartlebury Common twice a day and am devastated by the way they have cut trees down and not cleared up - a real fire hazard in this dry weather - talk about chain saw massacre. Why not let nature take its course. The cost of the fencing just defies belief in times of cut backs and recession

Guest

#353

2011-06-29 01:33

This common is one of the few places locally where us non landowners can walk unrestricted and enjoy 'natural' countryside. I say 'natural' because I subscribe to the view that the common is evolving in a natural way and should be left to evolve without interference. Surely the purpose of an area such as the common is to encourage the public to engage with it? This is done by feet on the ground. Will I be walking my dog on a lead through cattle with my 6 yr old son? No! I am very aware of the dangers of dogs in the vicinity of cattle. So we will be effectively banned from this common. No longer will my son be able to engage in the wildlife, vegetation and fauna which is so abundant on the common. Another example of those elected to protect out interests failing to look after the interests of the electorate.

Guest

#354

2011-06-29 01:34

I noticed that in the space of 24 hours, the notices placed around the common to inform the users of this impending act of vandalism have disappeared. Obvious that the powers that be do not take kindly to views contrary to their own and wish to stiffle free speech.

Guest

#355

2011-06-29 01:39

have used Hartlebury Common as it is 'common land' for over ten years to walk my dog (and yes, I do clear up the dog mess to those ' do do sprayers'!) and I now have MS which gives me limited mobility. I feel that the current council and its followers are vastly underestimating the damage to our local environment with the destruction of some beautiful trees on the site, which lets face it have only improved the experience of walking and habitation for birds and creatures on the common. By imposing 'cattle and their do do' on the site, I feel that they are infringing my human rights to walk the common unrestricted, safely and without having to have my dog on his lead, which due to my mobility problems I can no longer do! I hope that the cost of fencing this common land and keeping these cows pays for itself by putting back money into the public purse, afterall I expect our council tax has paid for this wretched project!

Anonymous

#356

2011-06-29 01:40

I'm looking forward to my interview, BBC 10.00 am Thursday main Hartlebury road car park. I have just come back from the common, "A wonderful, beautiful,place"

I met a chap and as usual I handed him a leaflet and asked his opinion.
Restoring the common to heathland was in his opinion perfectly fitting.

I asked him "Why?" He said "Because it needed to be managed." I asked him "Why?" He said "Because we would lose the heath." I answered, "We are told by Natural England and WCC that it has not been managed for 100yrs. Has it not done a good job of managing itself".
"If it is not managed, there will be no heath." "Ok" I said "But how come there is plenty of area not colonised by either trees or heather. Wouldn't the heather have colonised these areas by now.80% of the common is without tree cover anyway"

We moved onto the cattle and fire risk at the common. I asked him what he thought the cattle would do if there were raging fires. "They will do what any wild animal would do" and what would that be I asked. Not answering he stated "The fire was put out pretty damn quick anyway and it was only restricted to one spot and it burnt itself out". Really I said, I told him that, "The fire burnt for 5 hours before it was brought under control, the flames were over a 100 ft high It took 6 appliances and 50 firefighters. It was only because of the actions of the firefighters and staff that curtailed further disaster. "Well they did it" was his reply I explained about the drier nature of the common and it's greater potential for fire because of the felling of trees and scrub but to no avail. "Anyway" he said brightley, "The fencing is good for dog walkers"

The thing is, like Natural England, WCC, he could not muster a single reasoned substantive point of view or argument and seemed to feel as if my arguments were heretical without knowing why. As time goes by, I am begining to believe more, that the title, "Heathland Madness, the Juggernaut of Nature Conservation" could not be more relevant to Hartlebury. It's as if common sense has become mesmerised and transfixed. The success of authoritive bodies is to win at all costs, the public are to be quashed, opinion ignored, the financial end game more important than any thing else.

This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-06-29 01:47


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-06-29 01:48


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 01:52


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 01:54


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 01:55


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-06-29 01:56


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-06-29 01:57


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 01:58


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:00


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:01


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:01


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:02


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:04


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:06


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:06


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:11


This post has been removed by the author of this petition (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:12


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:14


This post has been removed by its writer (Show details)

2011-06-29 02:16