To protect and serve???


Guest

/ #57

2014-08-29 20:47

 I have found multiple things wrong, and contradicting. First; the date of the accident is wrong, it says 8/25, not the 22nd. Second; the driver was uninsured (which is illegal). Third; they show Andrew's licence #, but have is address as "HOMELESS" (why not give the address on his licence?). Forth, there is one page that says "there was no avoidance from the driver", the next page says the driver swerved ( which from witness reports, the driver never swerved). Fifth, the police refused to breathalize the driver on scene, but breathalized the dying Andrew and witness's.

 

Does this seem wrong to anyone??