Суд над Бхагавад-гитой / Attempt to ban Bhagavad-gita

Quoted post


Guest

#890

2011-12-17 17:32

Comment by Saksi Gopal das - BIF - Bhaktivedanta Investigation Force

It is commonplace defense for a case under adjudication to seek respite in the quote: “Innocent until proven Guilty,” but when the bases against an accused are loaded with eyewitness accounts, free of calumny, he/she is- Suspect until proven Innocent. Yet Radhanatha has, with the assistance of his liquor baron father, squashed basic law enforcement procedures that would point unequivocally to his implication in a 'murder by decree.'

Bearing in mind, homicide investigations are not restricted by statutes of limitation, Dharmatma’s statement above along, with Janmastmi Pr’s. squashed testimony below, provides ample evidence to reopen the case with a view to indicting Radhanath for his part in murder.

When you say…”ordered by Radhanath….to terminate Sulochan,” what you are saying is:
14) You were directly enlisted by Radhanath Swami to murder Sulochan, is that right?

>> That is correct.

15) What were his exact words in connection with your participation in executing the crime?

>> It was a ten minute prepared speech: It put the future of the KRSNA consciousness movement on this planet in Kirtanananda Swami’s hands, and that was in jeopardy because of the threats on the lives of NVC management. Radhanath Swami gave us the spiel on how- “as a ksatriya, your nature is to…” and all the rest of the bodily distinctions required to justify such an act in one’s mind. We were told that Sulochan had a hit list with half a dozen names on it, targeted for elimination. A pre-emptive strike was the mindset.

>> Radhanath’ Swami’s father, a criminal kingpin in the Chicago area for more than 6 decades, had the police connections that first put his son Radhanath in touch with the Chicago FBI office. Radhanath’s father was at one time, Chicago’s largest liquor distributor, with Mafia connections for 60 years or more


Comment by B. Radha-Govinda Swami:

Hare Krsna. All glories to Srila Prabhupada. PAMFO

I know Janmastami prabhu and Radhanath. Besides the murder Radhanath got Tirtha prabhu to do, Radhanath is not the “sadhu” he tries to make certain people think he is. For years Janmastami prabhu has had to deal with the reactions for surrendering to Radhanath’s convincing him to be part of the arrangements regarding Sulochan prabhu’s murder (Janmastami not doing the murder), and Radhanath’s later coverup attempts so it would not come to public knowledge that this murder happened because of Radhanath’s organizing.

If Radhanath was really the “saint” that cultish people attribute him, he would be honest and admit to the devotees that he did indeed play the part he did in Sulochan prabhu’s murder, and would explain honestly why he did.

But Radhanath’s coverup behavior is consistant with his other fraudulent activities, which I’m not going to take the time to address here. (I already get sick of thinking about this Rotten Nut, who is SOOOO PRETENTIOUS on all levels, but what is the MOST SICKENING, is that SO MANY people FALL for it.)

By dint of logic, if what Janmastami was saying “wasn’t true,” then either he would have to

1) Be crazy to go to the extent he is to commit such an offense towards another devotee in lying about that devotee and know that he’s “lying” – but he’s not – having knowledge of the reactions he could suffer from committing such offenses

2) Be crazy to go to the extent he is to “lie” about such a personality who is so “famous” in the ITS GON world (and know that he’s “lying” – but he’s not), knowing how much flack and hatred it will bring back to him from ISKCON devotees

3) Be crazy to be lying about R, if R really didn’t do as Janmastami prabhu is saying, yet, Janmastami prabhu was (really) thinking it to be true

4) Be crazy to go so far to implicate himself in such a thing, regarding his part in it, if he isn’t telling the truth, (but he is)

So either Janmastami prabhu is telling the truth, or he’s crazy and isn’t. So by dint of logic, these are the choices.

Actually, it’s Radhanath who’s so crazy with his delusions of himself regarding “position” because in the ultimate end of things, we are all anu jivas; servants of the servant of the servant of the servant…

The court stenographer would have been accurate if /she had typed in **rotten nut as opposed to **rot not because Radhanath is a rotten nut, taking this and other things into account.

Your servant,
B. Radha-Govinda
Hare Krsna

Radhanath confronted - YouTubeVideo

Radhanath and Yajya Purusha, the "The Isckon Masterminds" behind unlawful attempt to hijack of The Sanctuary @ 25 First Ave NY, NY 10003, being confronted by the lawful founders of The Sanctuary, as usual Radhanath continues to lie and deny under his pseudo Vaisnava garb. Hypocrites !!! A Plea from the New York Sanctuary


New Vrindaban YOUTUBE video documentary

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5HG80bJXu8
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=govinda107&p=r

The Battlefield of New Vrindavan in 18 Chapters
A pictorial history of New Vrindavan crimes, photo reportage
New Vrindaban History

Radhanatha Proven to be Involved in Murder of Sulocana
Radhanath Swami’s Alleged Involvement in Sulochan’s Murder
Shocking Evidence Points to Radhanatha Swami
Radhanath Swami – The Iskcon Gangster
The Other "Wonderful" Story of Radhanatha Swami
The mytical Radhanath Swami and his hidden story
Radhanatha's Magical Mystery Tour
Radhanath and Yajya Purusha, The Sanctuary Hijackers
Radhanath Swami - Saint or Sinner? - Charlatan or Saint?

Replies

This post has been removed by the site administrator (Show details)

2012-08-25 11:52:59