The comment numbers 51, 60 and 62 are all made by the same person who clearly has a vendetta.  They accuse the petitioner of lying while their remarks are riddled with inaccuracies and misstatements.  Who knows what unreliable source they are getting their "information" from because they don't say.  The party clearly knows the petitioner, but doesn't even have the courage to state their real name; rather, they only make accusations and insults. 

The fact remains that the family offered to settle the court case by having the dog live in another state.  The Judge said that sounded like a reasonable offer, but the Village refused to accept the offer.  The attorney for the Village gets to keep sending invoices for this matter as long as the attorney can keep the case going. 

Hawthorn Woods should accept the offer and allow the dog to live out its life out of state.  Enough is enough already. 

#63: - Village should accept the family's offer to settle! 

 To Guest:

So you know what the judge said? He or she said it is reasonable? And your sources are reliable?

Are you a "Guest" or are you the petioner?

Sounds to me the petitioner has a vendetta against the town.