The Eisenhower Expressway Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) St

Contact the author of the petition

This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition The Eisenhower Expressway Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) St.


Guest

#1

2013-10-02 14:20

More vehicle lanes just mean more congestion. The center ramps at Austin and Harlem have worked since the highway was constructed. They still work fine today. Do not waste millions of our dollars on a needless disruptive project. The more congested the highway is the more likely people will opt for transit. If transit was "free" like the highway the trains and buses would be jammed!

Guest

#2

2013-10-04 12:31

The Eisenhower is too crowded and is not safe.
It needs massive work asap.

Guest

#3

2013-10-04 16:04

I travel the Eisenhower often. Providing public transit to at least 88/294 if not even further, 88/355, would help relieve passenger travel by asignificant amount, can be seen anecdotally, even better proving it by traffic analyses