HBEDMSV Jan/Feb 2018 Examination

Comments

#6

Unfair paper as questions were not structured correctly and unfair mark allocation to each question. We were mislead by the TUT 201 that was given to us!!!!!

(Johannesburg, 2018-02-14)

#7

I am signing because I feel so misled. The lecture should not have given us direction of what to study. This is really not okay

(Gauteng, 2018-02-14)

#8

I strongly feel that I was mislead by the Msv lectures.

(Pietermaritzburg, 2018-02-14)

#9

MSV exam misleading and unfair.

(Pretoria, 2018-02-14)

#11

I'm signing this petition because I am extremely disappointed in the manner in which we were mislead. We went into that exam extremely confident, as we thought we were well prepared...we came out feeling like victims. This module is both financially and personally taxing. I honestly don't see myself repeating it due to other people's incompetence.

(Johannesburg, 2018-02-14)

#12

I support the Students position

(Saldanha, 2018-02-14)

#17

I think the exam paper was not fair.. The guidelines was not in accordance with the tutorial letter.. The tutorial letter stated work we must know, but not one question was about the work..

(Oudtshoorn, 2018-02-14)

#20

Tut 104 mentioned that if we study from assignments to 2 and 3 we must pass... This was totally misleading... Even tut 201 was misleading with the questions that were cautioned for us to understand... Layout of the paper and questions posed with respective marks scheme didn't make sense

(Newcastle , 2018-02-14)

#22

This exam was highly unfair!!!!!!!!!!!!
I will not stand for this !!!!!!
Justice must be served !!!!!!!

(Oudtshoorn , 2018-02-14)

#26

I feel that we were given misleading information that lead us to believe to focus on irrelevant content.

(East London, 2018-02-14)

#31

The question paper was not what was demarcated

(Springs, 2018-02-14)

#42

This paper was misleading with the guidelines given

(Durban , 2018-02-14)

#43

Emphasize a lot things that we should know but didn't ask any of those questions in the exam. Studied my heart out which they pointed out but non appeared.

(Vereeniging, 2018-02-14)

#45

I found that the direction given was misleading

(Durban , 2018-02-14)

#46

I have a problem with mark allocation of the question paper. Question 3 the last 2 questions.The weight of tge question does not equate to the mark allocated. Name 2 things = 8marks.
Then name and explain 6 types of parent involvement = 7 marks, this is frustrating.
Was the paper even moderated or maybe at HE moderation doesnt apply.
Also we cant be tested on something that we didnt learn its not fair.
In question 2 there was a question with grammar. Being asked to choose 2 from 4 but you dont even see the 4 to choose from.

(Cape Town, 2018-02-14)

#49

I belive the exam was unfair and we were mis led by the lecture as he gave us guidelines in tut02

(Bothaviile, 2018-02-14)

#52

Unfair and sub standard question Paper.

(Saldanha, 2018-02-14)

#53

Very confusing form of question especially question 2. Choose 2 from 4. But it's not even clear which 4 to choose from. Question 3. Name and discuss 6 parental involvement for 7 marks only. The next question says name 2 Ithink basic things on parental involvement but that counts for 6marks. What kind of mark allocation is that?
The tutorial letters said if we revise assignments 2&3 we must pass. But 80% of the paper did not even match such guidelines.

(Dannhauser , 2018-02-14)

#57

Reason to sign d petition
Supervising and evaluation of teacher is not explained in the text book
Central management is not explained in the text book and these question were asked with high marks

(Pretoria, 2018-02-14)

#62

I'm signing this petition because I'm one of the disappointed student about the msv examination, the examination was not what we expected we were mislead with the feedback, if there is a way of this matter to be resolve we will be happy .

(Ulundi, 2018-02-14)

#65

I am signing because the exam was unfair and it also contained centralisation which never formed part of the syllabus. The exam preparation 104 sad we should master assignment 2 and 3 we shall pass and only 10 percent on that paper come out.

(Pretoria, 2018-02-14)

#66

Im signing this petition because the paper was not fair.

(Ulundi, 2018-02-14)

#67

The paper was unfair, did not crospond with the demarcation

(Neistroom, 2018-02-14)

#72

I feel we where mislead. The paper was extremely unfair!

(Johannesburg , 2018-02-14)

#73

I'm signing because I am one of the those who are affected

(Polokwane , 2018-02-14)

#74

The exan paper was set outside the given chapters to know. This was not fair cos we did stick to the sections only to find that only 3 questions were from those sections..

(Umlazi, 2018-02-14)

#76

Because msv tut promise to study assignment 2and 3 but nothing at all

(Mtuba, 2018-02-14)

#81

The form of questions marks it don't understand all I was guessing the answers because of questions

(Witbank , 2018-02-14)

#82

We were seriously mislead by what is important for todays test

(Pretoria, 2018-02-14)

#83

I strong feel that I was mislead by the MSV lecture

(Newcastle, 2018-02-14)

#85

I was not satisfy with the content of the paper

(Johannesburg, 2018-02-14)

#86

The paper was unfair and was not according to the guidelines.

(Oudtshoorn, 2018-02-14)

#88

I'm signing because... the students feel unhappy

(oudtshoorn, 2018-02-14)

#89

I am not satisfied with the question paper.

(Gautenh, 2018-02-14)

#91

That lectures lied and misled us

(Gauteng, 2018-02-14)

#93

The paper wasnt fair.

(Richards bay, 2018-02-14)

#94

I agree with the above statements.

(Port Edward , 2018-02-14)

#96

I'm signing because I feel this exam was rather misleading

(Cape Town, 2018-02-14)

#98

Our was unfair

(Durban, 2018-02-14)

#99

I am not happy with the exam we wrote and that I strongly believe that exam should cover a certa

(Estcourt, 2018-02-14)

#104

The paper was not fair as the tutorial stated that if we concentrate on tut 201 and tut 202, we MUST pass

(Durban, 2018-02-15)

#105

im signing this petition because i prepare the themes that the lecturer mention in the tutorial letters but the exam was not from those letters. so there was nothing about themes they have said.

(Vryheid , 2018-02-15)

#108

Because of the setting style for MSV question paper was not inline with tutorial 201 question on that one we have to apply knowledge of which some of us is for first time in teaching and the wise part of it I'm working at college or Campus not at schools

(Kemptonpark, 2018-02-15)

#111

N. G Jiyane

(Newcastle , 2018-02-15)

#114

Was mislead by the scope, the content was not clear, on question 3 last naming question was given 6 marks but was asked to name only 2, that did not match the effort..

(Ulundi, 2018-02-15)

#115

Throughout my 6 years of studying I have never failed an exam. I always make sure I know everything and I go above and beyond when preparing for an exam. This exam was not what I prepared for and I feel mislead by UNISA.

(Richards Bay, 2018-02-15)

#117

I'm signing because the guidelines on TUT letters regarding the exam were misleading, nothing on those tutorial letters were in the exam

(Witbank, 2018-02-15)

#122

There were aspects of the examination that were not covered in assignments or tutorials e.g. Centralisation. There was little support or guidance during the year from lecturers.

(Durban, 2018-02-15)

#125

I share the same sentiments

(Frankfort , 2018-02-16)

#127

We were given a demarcation on what to STUDY but l got the shock of my life. The exam was nowhere near the if you STUDY assignment 2 and 3 YOU MUST pass. I have been misled

(Johannesburg, 2018-02-18)

#129

The exam was too tight,l request to start afresh

(Vryheid, 2018-02-22)